Internet-Draft IETFIPR May 2025
Deen Expires 25 November 2025 [Page]
Workgroup:
gen
Internet-Draft:
draft-deen-gen-ipmc-contributor-rights-latest
Updates:
5378 (if approved)
Published:
Intended Status:
Informational
Expires:
Author:
G. Deen
Comcast-NBCUniversal

ABC

Abstract

This will have something to do with [BERNE] stuff and [RFC5378] but not [RFC822]

About This Document

This note is to be removed before publishing as an RFC.

The latest revision of this draft can be found at https://gitnnelg.github.io/ieft-contribution-rights/draft-deen-gen-ipmc-contributor-rights.html. Status information for this document may be found at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-deen-gen-ipmc-contributor-rights/.

Discussion of this document takes place on the genarea Working Group mailing list (mailto:tlp-interest@ietf.org), which is archived at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/tlp-interest/. Subscribe at https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tlp-interest/.

Source for this draft and an issue tracker can be found at https://github.com/gitnnelg/ietf-contribution-rights.

Status of This Memo

This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

This Internet-Draft will expire on 25 November 2025.

Table of Contents

1. Conventions and Definitions

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.

2. Security Considerations

TODO

3. IANA Considerations

This document has no IANA actions.

4. References

4.1. Normative References

[BCP79]
Best Current Practice 79, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/bcp79>.
At the time of writing, this BCP comprises the following:
Bradner, S. and J. Contreras, "Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology", BCP 79, RFC 8179, DOI 10.17487/RFC8179, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8179>.
[RFC5378]
Bradner, S., Ed. and J. Contreras, Ed., "Rights Contributors Provide to the IETF Trust", BCP 78, RFC 5378, DOI 10.17487/RFC5378, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5378>.
[RFC822]
Crocker, D., "STANDARD FOR THE FORMAT OF ARPA INTERNET TEXT MESSAGES", STD 11, RFC 822, DOI 10.17487/RFC0822, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc822>.
[RFC2119]
Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2119>.
[RFC8174]
Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8174>.

4.2. Informative References

[BERNE]
"Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Work", n.d., <http://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/>.

Acknowledgments

Author's Address

Glenn Deen
Comcast-NBCUniversal